<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geek By Night Episode 10 &#8211; Panel Discussion Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/</link>
	<description>Your hub for geek related podcasts. Home of GeekiNtertainment, The BuffCast, Two Geeks, True Believers, MeteorGEEK!, and the AngelCast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:39:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8403</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8403</guid>
		<description>Just you wait Zeigler.... JUST YOU WAIT!!!!


MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHA! HA!

HA! *cough* *sputter* 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just you wait Zeigler&#8230;. JUST YOU WAIT!!!!</p>
<p>MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHA! HA!</p>
<p>HA! *cough* *sputter*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8381</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8381</guid>
		<description>We had a whole discussion about the spelling of that word, and I asked you if my comment looked alright and you said... yes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a whole discussion about the spelling of that word, and I asked you if my comment looked alright and you said&#8230; yes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Zeigler</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8380</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zeigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8380</guid>
		<description>I like dis panel Discuss. It enlightening and Friendly! Enjoy much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like dis panel Discuss. It enlightening and Friendly! Enjoy much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8378</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8378</guid>
		<description>I recommended nothing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommended nothing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8377</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8377</guid>
		<description>Damn Scott, that’s the last time I listen to his spelling recommendation…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn Scott, that’s the last time I listen to his spelling recommendation…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8375</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8375</guid>
		<description>Well, this got ridiculous and a little embarrassing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this got ridiculous and a little embarrassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeriouslynotWill</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8372</link>
		<dc:creator>SeriouslynotWill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8372</guid>
		<description>Thank you for making that a little more understandable. As someone who only started visiting the site post-John i didn&#039;t understand why there was a commotion. But thank you Randy for explaining it a  little better without beating around the bush, now let&#039;s move on to something else...you mentioned season 2...how much money would I have to use to get more headway in that direction? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for making that a little more understandable. As someone who only started visiting the site post-John i didn&#8217;t understand why there was a commotion. But thank you Randy for explaining it a  little better without beating around the bush, now let&#8217;s move on to something else&#8230;you mentioned season 2&#8230;how much money would I have to use to get more headway in that direction? <img src='http://www.geekshow.us/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saberj</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8371</link>
		<dc:creator>Saberj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8371</guid>
		<description>John has his own site and his own Podcast that he can rant with. So it&#039;s not like his side of the story isn&#039;t being told.

As someone that dealt with John very little, I like to think I have a pretty neutral position with him. I never had a personal problem with him, and I was never negatively effected by him. 

However, I was lucky enough to be let in on a lot of early drafts of the GBN scripts, the looks at the characters, etc. So one of my big annoyances with John was always in the amount of credit he tried to claim versus what was actually done before he came along. Very little of the overall story changed when he came around. 

I&#039;m pretty sure that &quot;That Yellow Mustard&quot; and Kim were pretty much his creations, but I don&#039;t know to what extent he planned out Kim&#039;s story. I do remember hearing some horror stories early on regarding the direction he wanted to take the story using her. 

The issue here isn&#039;t that John can&#039;t defend himself. He&#039;s a grown man that can defend himself, but he&#039;ll be using his own bandwidth to do that. When the whole issue went down, he wanted to use the site to bash the site. Which is why he was banned from using everything. If you work at Wal-Mart or McDonalds, and you have bad things to say about them, then say those things. But don&#039;t expect them to allow you to keep your job while you do your preaching.

The whole situation was a headache, and I can say without a doubt that I would not care to relive any of it. But I definitely know that John has gotten credit for what was his, and anything going on from the point that he left onwards has extremely little to do with him.

It would be best for everyone if nobody felt the need to publicly bash or defend him. There really is no need for it. What&#039;s done is done, and it&#039;s now all in the past. I&#039;ll be glad when we can move on to season two, where you know that very little of his thoughts remain on the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John has his own site and his own Podcast that he can rant with. So it&#8217;s not like his side of the story isn&#8217;t being told.</p>
<p>As someone that dealt with John very little, I like to think I have a pretty neutral position with him. I never had a personal problem with him, and I was never negatively effected by him. </p>
<p>However, I was lucky enough to be let in on a lot of early drafts of the GBN scripts, the looks at the characters, etc. So one of my big annoyances with John was always in the amount of credit he tried to claim versus what was actually done before he came along. Very little of the overall story changed when he came around. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that &#8220;That Yellow Mustard&#8221; and Kim were pretty much his creations, but I don&#8217;t know to what extent he planned out Kim&#8217;s story. I do remember hearing some horror stories early on regarding the direction he wanted to take the story using her. </p>
<p>The issue here isn&#8217;t that John can&#8217;t defend himself. He&#8217;s a grown man that can defend himself, but he&#8217;ll be using his own bandwidth to do that. When the whole issue went down, he wanted to use the site to bash the site. Which is why he was banned from using everything. If you work at Wal-Mart or McDonalds, and you have bad things to say about them, then say those things. But don&#8217;t expect them to allow you to keep your job while you do your preaching.</p>
<p>The whole situation was a headache, and I can say without a doubt that I would not care to relive any of it. But I definitely know that John has gotten credit for what was his, and anything going on from the point that he left onwards has extremely little to do with him.</p>
<p>It would be best for everyone if nobody felt the need to publicly bash or defend him. There really is no need for it. What&#8217;s done is done, and it&#8217;s now all in the past. I&#8217;ll be glad when we can move on to season two, where you know that very little of his thoughts remain on the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Ruzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8369</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Ruzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8369</guid>
		<description>Psssst. The term is moot point. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psssst. The term is moot point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Ruzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8368</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Ruzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8368</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to get into the details, right now, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a matter of John as a person. But Kim with John writing her wasn&#039;t as good as Kim in episode 10. And it has nothing to do with John as a person or what went down, but the writing stand for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to get into the details, right now, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a matter of John as a person. But Kim with John writing her wasn&#8217;t as good as Kim in episode 10. And it has nothing to do with John as a person or what went down, but the writing stand for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeriouslynotWill</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8367</link>
		<dc:creator>SeriouslynotWill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8367</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying not to take sides at all. While Kim as a chracter is way greater now, I don&#039;t think we should blame John when he can&#039;t defend himself. If one of my friends did something horrible to me I should at least hear them out, regardless about whether I care about them at all anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying not to take sides at all. While Kim as a chracter is way greater now, I don&#8217;t think we should blame John when he can&#8217;t defend himself. If one of my friends did something horrible to me I should at least hear them out, regardless about whether I care about them at all anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Ruzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8362</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Ruzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8362</guid>
		<description>And John has had writing credits since he left. But facts are he did some really cruel things to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And John has had writing credits since he left. But facts are he did some really cruel things to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Ruzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8361</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Ruzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8361</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the things she did, it&#039;s the nuances of the writing. She wasn&#039;t written as a full characters in episode 5, she was kinda two dimentional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the things she did, it&#8217;s the nuances of the writing. She wasn&#8217;t written as a full characters in episode 5, she was kinda two dimentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TotallyNotNick</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8358</link>
		<dc:creator>TotallyNotNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8358</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s supposed to be opnion, by the way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s supposed to be opnion, by the way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TotallyNotNick</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8357</link>
		<dc:creator>TotallyNotNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8357</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just saying it seems kinda lame saying that Kim post -John is exponentially better than KIm with John-on board. Who&#039;s to say that the abortion and the eating in bead after sex weren&#039;t things that John had in mind, but just got the boot before those ideas could reach the masses?

Look, I&#039;m not trying to start any comment wars, I&#039;m just saying that it makes me sad that Pavlitch has become this virus that the show had to be cured of. I loved Epiosde 5 and Episode 2 and thought he did some really cool things for the show and it&#039;d be nice if the poor bastard was given some post-depatrtue credit every now and again, regaurdless of your oinion of him as a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just saying it seems kinda lame saying that Kim post -John is exponentially better than KIm with John-on board. Who&#8217;s to say that the abortion and the eating in bead after sex weren&#8217;t things that John had in mind, but just got the boot before those ideas could reach the masses?</p>
<p>Look, I&#8217;m not trying to start any comment wars, I&#8217;m just saying that it makes me sad that Pavlitch has become this virus that the show had to be cured of. I loved Epiosde 5 and Episode 2 and thought he did some really cool things for the show and it&#8217;d be nice if the poor bastard was given some post-depatrtue credit every now and again, regaurdless of your oinion of him as a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8352</guid>
		<description>But you liked her character, and so your argument that she is only in two scenes is kind of a mute point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you liked her character, and so your argument that she is only in two scenes is kind of a mute point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TotallyNotNick</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8348</link>
		<dc:creator>TotallyNotNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8348</guid>
		<description>To be fair, she was only in two scenes in Episode 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, she was only in two scenes in Episode 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AthenaMuze</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8347</link>
		<dc:creator>AthenaMuze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8347</guid>
		<description>Also, can I say damn you Scott for naming one of your main characters Kim? It&#039;s really unnerving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, can I say damn you Scott for naming one of your main characters Kim? It&#8217;s really unnerving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AthenaMuze</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8346</link>
		<dc:creator>AthenaMuze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8346</guid>
		<description>Either way, she was a bit bland. She&#039;s much more of interesting in this one. Less of a prop and more of a character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way, she was a bit bland. She&#8217;s much more of interesting in this one. Less of a prop and more of a character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TotallyNotNick</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8345</link>
		<dc:creator>TotallyNotNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8345</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it was Jon&#039;s fantasy girl so much as it was Gibson&#039;s. That whole episode we were seeing everything through Gibson&#039;s eyes, so of course Kim would appear to be this perfect dream girl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it was Jon&#8217;s fantasy girl so much as it was Gibson&#8217;s. That whole episode we were seeing everything through Gibson&#8217;s eyes, so of course Kim would appear to be this perfect dream girl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachelg</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8334</link>
		<dc:creator>rachelg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8334</guid>
		<description>well that would just be silly! syrup would get everywhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well that would just be silly! syrup would get everywhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachelg</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8333</link>
		<dc:creator>rachelg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8333</guid>
		<description>I thought she was pretty one-dimensional. I agree with Rachel, Kim was John&#039;s fantasy girl in episode 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought she was pretty one-dimensional. I agree with Rachel, Kim was John&#8217;s fantasy girl in episode 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>It must be difficult if you are eating breakfast at the same time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be difficult if you are eating breakfast at the same time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TotallyNotNick</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8282</link>
		<dc:creator>TotallyNotNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8282</guid>
		<description>I actually really liked Episode 5 Kim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually really liked Episode 5 Kim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Ruzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8258</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Ruzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 05:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8258</guid>
		<description>I think John had some of his own fantasies stuck into episode 5...  Kim seemed kinda flat back then, I love her now. &lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think John had some of his own fantasies stuck into episode 5&#8230;  Kim seemed kinda flat back then, I love her now. &lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AthenaMuze</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8244</link>
		<dc:creator>AthenaMuze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8244</guid>
		<description>Chris can&#039;t really tell the difference, he can be slow sometimes... 

I agree that I liked the changes to Kim in this episode. Less of an ideal and more of a &quot;real&quot; girl. 

Also, yay for Brian!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris can&#8217;t really tell the difference, he can be slow sometimes&#8230; </p>
<p>I agree that I liked the changes to Kim in this episode. Less of an ideal and more of a &#8220;real&#8221; girl. </p>
<p>Also, yay for Brian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeriouslynotWill</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8205</link>
		<dc:creator>SeriouslynotWill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8205</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s more of a sentence...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s more of a sentence&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8203</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8203</guid>
		<description>My safety word is &quot;OH GOD IT HURTS!  PLEASE, STOP!  STOP, PLEASE!&quot;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My safety word is &#8220;OH GOD IT HURTS!  PLEASE, STOP!  STOP, PLEASE!&#8221;"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachelg</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8200</link>
		<dc:creator>rachelg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8200</guid>
		<description>My safety word is &quot;waffle&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My safety word is &#8220;waffle&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TotallyNotNick</title>
		<link>http://www.geekshow.us/content/podcasts/geek-by-night/geek-by-night-episode-10-panel-discussion-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8183</link>
		<dc:creator>TotallyNotNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 06:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekshow.us/?p=1605#comment-8183</guid>
		<description>why rachel? Is life imitating art?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why rachel? Is life imitating art?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
